Methodology Applied In The Writing Of Monographic Works Of A Systematic Review Type
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5377/elhigo.v13i1.16371Keywords:
Revision, systematic review, methodology, research protocolAbstract
Systematic reviews are investigations that allow the analysis of scientific evidence, becoming an essential tool when acquiring and implementing knowledge. strengthen the methodological and scientific aspects related to the methodological design of the systematic review-type research protocol Scientific research applied in systematic reviews revolves around five fundamental line, which are evaluated by the research committee of the Faculties of Medical Sciences and, subsequently, by the examining board. The research protocol requires a type of writing that is typical of a project. Therefore, it is recommended that the researcher submit a document with the elements that belong to him, this article describes each element in simple terms so that the researcher is able to convert theory into practice and produce new knowledge with a high Scientific and methodological degree. The applicability of systematic reviews in the generation of knowledge lies in the fact that this type of study summarizes the results of several investigations, therefore, it turns out to be an extremely efficient method to obtain the "final result" about what works and what does not with respect to a specific topic or line of research for which scientific evidence is available.
Downloads
References
Chien, P. F., & Khan, K. S. (2023). Systematic Review Reporting - Writing concisely and precisely. Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 39(2), 317–322. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.2.7428
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editores). Manual Cochrane para revisiones sistemáticas de intervenciones versión 6.0 (actualizado en julio de 2019). Cochrane, 2019. Disponible en www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
Kirmayr, M., Quilodrán, C., Valente, B., Loezar, C., Garegnani, L., & Franco, J. V. A. (2021). The GRADE approach, Part 1: how to assess the certainty of the evidence. Metodología GRADE, parte 1: cómo evaluar la certeza de la evidencia. Medwave, 21(2), e8109. https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2021.02.8109
Linares-Espinós, E., Hernández, V., Domínguez-Escrig, J. L., Fernández-Pello, S., Hevia, V., Mayor, J., Padilla-Fernández, B., & Ribal, M. J. (2018). Methodology of a systematic review. Metodología de una revisión sistemática. Actas urologicas espanolas, 42(8), 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2018.01.010
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Annals of internal medicine, 151(4), W65–W94. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136
Manchado Garabito, R, Tamames Gómez, S, López González, M, Mohedano Macías, L, D´Agostino, M y Veiga de Cabo, J. (2009). Revisiones Sistemáticas Exploratorias. Medicina y Seguridad del Trabajo, 55(216), 12-19. http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0465-546X2009000300002&lng=es&tlng=es.
McInnes, M. D. F., Moher, D., Thombs, B. D., McGrath, T. A., Bossuyt, P. M., and the PRISMA-DTA Group, Clifford, T., Cohen, J. F., Deeks, J. J., Gatsonis, C., Hooft, L., Hunt, H. A., Hyde, C. J., Korevaar, D. A., Leeflang, M. M. G., Macaskill, P., Reitsma, J. B., Rodin, R., Rutjes, A. W. S.,
Salameh, J. P., … Willis, B. H. (2018). Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement. JAMA, 319(4), 388–396. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.19163
Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow C D et al. (2021) PRISMA 2020 explicación y elaboración: orientación actualizada y ejemplos para informar revisiones sistemáticas BMJ 2021; 372 :n160 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
Pineda E., B y De Alvarado E., L. (2008). Metodología de la investigación. 3ª Ed. página 52.
Piura López, J. (2012) Metodología de la investigación científica 7ª Ed. pp. 73,84-125
Pardal-Refoyo, J., L y Pardal-Peláez, B. (2020). Anotaciones para estructurar una revisión sistemática. Revista ORL, 11(2), 155-160. Epub 13 de octubre de 2020. https://dx.doi.org/10.14201/orl.22882
Quilodrán, C., Kirmayr, M., Valente, B., Pérez-Bracchiglione, J., Garegnani, L., & Franco, J. V. A. (2021). The GRADE approach, Part 2: Evidence to decision frameworksoutlining decision-making in health. Metodología GRADE, parte 2: de la evidencia a la decisión—esquematizando la toma de decisiones en salud. Medwave, 21(4), e8182. https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2021.04.81
Rethlefsen, M. L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A. P., Moher, D., Page, M. J., Koffel, J. B., & PRISMA-S Group (2021). PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Systematic reviews, 10(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-
Sobrido Prieto, M y Rumbo-Prieto, J., M. (2018). La revisión sistemática: pluralidad de enfoques y metodologías. Enfermería Clínica, 28(6), 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2018.08.008
Sanabria, A. J., Rigau, D., Rotaeche, R., Selva, A., marzo-Castillejo, M., & Alonso-Coello, P. (2015). Sistema GRADE: metodología para la realización de recomendaciones para la práctica clínica [GRADE: Methodology for formulating and grading recommendations in clinical practice]. Atencion primaria, 47(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2013.12.013
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & CONSORT Group (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Annals of internal medicine, 152(11), 726–732. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232
Urra Medina, E; Barría Pailaquilén, R., M. (2010). Systematic Review and its Relationship with Evidence-Based Practice in Health. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 18(4), 824–831. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692010000400023
Uman L. S. (2011). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent, 20(1), 57–59.
Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & STROBE Initiative (2008). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 61(4), 344–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
