Scientific and technical foundations in the formulation and processing of meat products

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5377/elhigo.v14i2.19127

Keywords:

Meat products, formulation, processing, yield, water holding capacity, sensory evaluation

Abstract

The research objective was to describe the scientific and technical foundations in the formulation and processing of meat products. Worked out Formulas in triplicate for traditional products such as chops, ribs, smoked meat pieces, smoked sausages, chicken, and fish nuggets. Technical and scientific criteria were applied for the formulations to comply with quantities and concentrations of additives according to food regulatory standards (Codex et al., and RTCA). Exciting data were obtained from the CRA for products such as smoked chop at 83.96%, pork leg or ham at 94.14%, and yields for smoked sausages at 97.05±0.22% and smoked rib at 68.57±10.00%. Regarding the sensory evaluation, the panelists valued extenders such as corn flour in sausages; 50% expressed that they liked it a lot, and 20% liked it very much with soy flour, followed by 40% who wanted it moderately. On a scale from 1 to 6 (level of pleasantness), the corn extender presented an average of 5.40, and the sausage with soy flour was 4.80. Sensory evaluation was applied as a methodology that guarantees quality and acceptability in the development of meat products.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ever Adolfo Reyes Puerto , National Autonomous University of Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras

The research objective was to describe the scientific and technical foundations in the formulation and processing of meat products. Worked out Formulas in triplicate for traditional products such as chops, ribs, smoked meat pieces, smoked sausages, chicken, and fish nuggets. Technical and scientific criteria were applied for the formulations to comply with quantities and concentrations of additives according to food regulatory standards (Codex et al., and RTCA). Exciting data were obtained from the CRA for products such as smoked chop at 83.96%, pork leg or ham at 94.14%, and yields for smoked sausages at 97.05±0.22% and smoked rib at 68.57±10.00%. Regarding the sensory evaluation, the panelists valued extenders such as corn flour in sausages; 50% expressed that they liked it a lot, and 20% liked it very much with soy flour, followed by 40% who wanted it moderately. On a scale from 1 to 6 (level of pleasantness), the corn extender presented an average of 5.40, and the sausage with soy flour was 4.80. Sensory evaluation was applied as a methodology that guarantees quality and acceptability in the development of meat products.

References

Baca, Y., Marcía, J., Chavez, V., Fernández, S., Montoya, H., Baca, J., . . . Ore, F. (2021). Determinación de Nitritos por Espectrofotometría UVvisible enProductos Embutidos de tipo Jamón. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 5(2), 2299-2308. doi:https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v5i2.435

Dergal, S. B. (2006). Química de los alimentos. México: PEARSON EDUCACIÓN.

INCAP. (26 de septiembre de 2018). Instituto de Nutrición de Centro América y Panamá. Obtenido de https://www.sennutricion.org/media/tablas/INCAP.pdf

Latorre, M. E., Cáffaro, E. M., Cepeda, R. E., Garitta, L., Sosa, M., & Purslow, P. P. (2018). Valoración de aspectos vinculados al consumo, calidad y seguridad de la carne, en consumidores argentinos de carne. Idesia (Arica), 36(3), 45-52. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292018005001003

León, M., Arduz, A., & Velandia, M. (2017). Composición fisicoquímica de la carne de ovejo, pollo, res y cerdo. Alimentech Ciencia y Tecnología Alimentaria, 15(2), 62-75. Obtenido de https://revistas.unipamplona.edu.co/ojs_viceinves/index.php/ALIMEN/article/view/2969/1594

López, A. F., Martínez, E. G., & Segovia, I. F. (2013). Determinación de la capacidad de retención de agua (CRA). Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. Obtenido de https://riunet.upv.es/bitstream/handle/10251/29835/Determinaci%C3%B3n%20CRA_m%C3%A9todo%20prensado.pdf?sequence=3

Ramírez, M. I., Vargas, R. D., Torres, B. d., Torrescano, G. R., & Sánchez, A. (2018). Extractos de hojas de plantas para conservar la calidad de la carne y los productos cárnicos frescos. Biotecnia, 20(3), 155-164. doi:https://doi.org/10.18633/biotecnia.v20i3.712

Rivera, A. T., Cuadros, M. O., Hinojosa, B. K., Castilla, P. F., & Claros, B. P. (2017). Conservación microbiológica de embutido cárnico artesanal con aceites esenciales Eugenia caryophyllata Y Thymus vulgaris. Biotecnología en el Sector Agropecuario y Agroindustrial, 15(2), 30-41. doi:https://doi.org/10.18684/bsaa(v15)ediciónespecial2.576

Rivera, J. A., & Girón, E. F. (2022). La fibra dietética comoingrediente funcional en la formulación de productos cárnicos. Tecnociencia Chihuahua, 16(1), e 892. doi:https://doi.org/10.54167/tecnociencia.v16i1.892

Vásquez, R. E., Ballesteros, H. H., & Muñoz, C. A. (2007). Factores asociados con la calidad de la carne. I parte: la terneza de la carne bovina en 40 empresas ganaderas de la región Caribe y el Magdalena Medio. Corproica. Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria, 8(2), 60-65. Obtenido de https://revistacta.agrosavia.co/index.php/revista/article/view/95/95

Vásquez, S. M., Suárez, H., & Zapata, S. (2009). Utilización de sustancias antimicrobianas por bacterias ácido lácticas en la conservación de la carne. Revista chilena de nutrición, 36(1), 64-71. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-75182009000100007

Published

2024-12-17

How to Cite

Reyes Puerto , E. A. . (2024). Scientific and technical foundations in the formulation and processing of meat products . The Scientific Journal "El Higo&Quot;, 14(2), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.5377/elhigo.v14i2.19127

Issue

Section

Scientific articles